A basic function of law in a civilized society is to allocate the costs of harm to those who caused it. In the case of a gang shooting or terrorist attack, penalties are imposed on the gang member or terrorist. But what of the person who sold them their weapons?
In 2004, relatives of eight people shot in the Washington-area sniper attacks received $2.5 million dollars from the maker and seller of the rifle used in those shootings. That was a matter of simple justice. But the gun lobby had no use for that kind of justice. They went to work and, the next year, Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, severely reducing the legal liability of gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers for reckless acts that send guns to the black market. The National Rifle Association called it “the most significant piece of pro-gun legislation in 20 years.”
This kind of legislation encourages arms dealers to turn a blind eye to the lethal consequences of what they peddle, and rewards their breathtaking irresponsibility.
HowManyMore Must Die @howmanymore3
Let Shooting Victims Sue fb.me/DMMk8pJ1Internet Activist @InternetAct12NYT Opinion @nytopinion
Let gun violence victims sue the firearms industry, says former Manhattan DA Morgenthau. nyti.ms/135jwjqParentsAntiGunViolen @ParentsAGV
Last week, we posted a story about a man suing arms maker Glock, Inc., subsequent to an accident that left him... fb.me/1Oua8jAXu