Censorship on college campuses is wrong, even if it’s conservatives doing the censoring AP Photo/Ryan VanVelzer
Rep. Bob Thorpe, R-Flagstaff, speaks about the need for increased security measures after reporters were denied access to the floor pending criminal and civil background checks, in Phoenix on Thursday, April 7, 2016. (AP Photo/Ryan VanVelzer)

In order to maintain our moral high ground over terrorists, we banned the use of torture. But risk of redundancy hasn’t stopped two Arizona state legislators from taking a page out of the SJW handbook by introducing a bill that would strip state aid from schools with classes that teach progressive attitudes on race, class, and gender.

HB2120 bans all school districts, charter schools, and public colleges from allowing any courses, classes, events, and activities that “promote the overthrow of the United States government,” “[p]romote DIVISION, resentment OR SOCIAL JUSTICE toward a race, GENDER, RELIGION, POLITICAL AFFILIATION, SOCIAL CLASS or OTHER class of people,” “[a]dvocate solidarity OR ISOLATION BASED ON RACE,” or “NEGATIVELY TARGET SPECIFIC NATIONALITIES OR COUNTRIES.”

This bill—which Republican sponsor Bob Thorpe admits is in need of revision—would presumably ban privilege walks, race theory classes, anti-Israel demonstrations, Black Lives Matter protests and a whole host of other events and courses.

I say “presumably” because I’m honestly not sure how this bill will be enforced since its text does not even bother defining the term “social justice.”

RELATED: Why are we responding to insane PC culture with equally insane infantilism?

Is it “social justice” to demand reforms to a criminal justice system that overwhelmingly targets minorities? Does reading Marx or Žižek qualify as promoting “resentment” toward a social class? Does Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” vilify white people and promote racial isolation? Would a fundraiser for North Korean refugees “negatively target” North Korea?

And who would be in charge of deciding which syllabi and events meet these criteria?

This bill would be the kind that grows into a monster, full of loopholes and exceptions, with its masters wielding it viciously against their enemies until the day that it finally turns and devours the arm that holds its leash.

This is the same censorship that sends Breitbart readers into frenzies when a liberal university cancels a talk by Milo Yiannopoulos.

RELATED: Yale professor coddles students triggered by Trump victory—or is he?

HB2120 is nothing more than Trump-fueled reactionary triumphalism, driven by the patronizing pipe dream of unity, which claims that, with the election over, everyone in the country needs to “come together” and “get on board.”


No one needs to get on board with anything. This is America, and we have a beautiful tradition here of fighting each other tooth and nail. Our money says “Out of many, one,” but the emergence of the “one” doesn’t obliterate the “many” from which it rises.

Silencing voices of dissent in the name of American unity will only lead to greater division.

Grayson Quay About the author:
Grayson Quay is a freelance writer whose work has been published by, Townhall, the Washington Times, and the National Interest. He is a graduate of Grove City College, a former high school teacher, and a current M.A. student at Georgetown University. His interests center on political discourse, including issues of free speech, identity politics, pop culture, and online political discussion. He enjoys writing poetry, listening to NPR, and mixing up an icy cocktail of red wine and Sprite on a hot summer day. Follow him on Twitter @hemingquay
View More Articles

Stories You Might Like