Amber Heard Gets More Bad News For Her Career

In another possible setback for the actor, the biggest movie on her slate — the ‘Aquaman’ sequel — might be delayed.

FAIRFAX, VA - JUNE 1: (NY & NJ NEWSPAPERS OUT) Amber Heard departs the Fairfax County Courthouse after the verdict announced_on June 1, 2022 in Fairfax, Virginia. The jury in the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard case awarded Depp $15 million in damages to his career over an op-ed Heard wrote in the Washington Post in 2018.(Photo by Cliff Owen/Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images)

In another possible setback for Amber Heard, the biggest movie on her slate — the Aquaman sequel— might hit theaters later than expected.

Videos By Rare

Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom is currently scheduled for release on March 17, 2023. However, Warner Bros. Discovery’s recent earnings call sparked speculation that its release date may get bumped, per The Hollywood Reporter.

It’s presently unclear why the film faces postponement. But it’s probably not due to Amber Heard headlines, as Warner might also delay Shazam! Fury of the Gods.

The news comes just a few days after TMZ relayed that Amber Heard recently sold her Southern California home. Ensuing speculation suggested she might need the money to pay for her ongoing legal battles with ex-husband Johnny Depp.

TMZ reported that Amber Heard sold the desert home in Yucca Valley, California, for $1.05 million — twice what she paid for it.

2022: A Horrible Year For Amber Heard

In June, a jury found Heard guilty of defamation against Depp. The decision resulted in a $10.3 million award for Amber Heard’s ex-husband. With a verdict additionally awarding Heard compensatory damages of $2 million, she is on the hook for $8.3 million.

Heard’s attorneys claim she can’t afford to pay that amount.

Last month, Heard and her legal team filed an appeal of the jury’s decision.

A spokesperson for Amber Heard told news and media outlets that they believe they have adequate grounds for appeal.

“We believe the court made errors that prevented a just and fair verdict consistent with the First Amendment,” they said. “We are therefore appealing the verdict. While we realize today’s filing will ignite the Twitter bonfires, there are steps we need to take to ensure both fairness and justice.”

Heard’s attorney, Elaine Bredehoft, publicly mentioned numerous perceived errors during the case proceedings. For example, they believe the jury was improperly vetted and another is that they were not properly sequestered. 

Share via:

Leave a Reply

Exit mobile version